Reference for Bava Batra 195:6
ופליגא דרב חייא בר יוסף דאמר רב חייא בר יוסף חמרא מזלא דמריה גרים שנא' (חבקוק ב, ה) ואף כי היין בוגד גבר יהיר וגו'
then, it must be inferred that [the buyer specifically] said to him [that he required the wine] for [flavouring] dish[es].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And knowing that his wine turns sour, the seller had no right to sell him it for the purpose required. Now since the second clause of our Mishnah speaks of such a case, the first clause also must speak of such a case; and the reason for the seller's exemption from all responsibility must, therefore, be attributed to the fact that the wine was kept in the jugs of the buyer. ');"><sup>11</sup></span> This view<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That our Mishnah speaks of wine in the buyer's jugs and that, if it had remained in the seller's jugs. the latter would have been responsible. ');"><sup>12</sup></span>